Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 24
Filtrar
1.
Biomed Pharmacother ; 159: 114272, 2023 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36706629

RESUMO

The benefit of adding the antiangiogenic drug aflibercept to FOLFIRI regime in metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) patients resistant to or progressive on an oxaliplatin-based therapy has been previously demonstrated. However, the absence of validated biomarkers to predict greater outcomes is a major challenge encountered when using antiangiogenic therapies. In this study we investigated profiles of circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) to build predictive models of response to treatment and survival. Plasma was obtained from 98 metastatic CRC patients enrolled in a clinical phase II trial before receiving FOLFIRI plus aflibercept treatment, and the circulating levels of 754 individual miRNAs were quantified using real-time PCR. A distinct signature of circulating miRNAs differentiated responder from non-responder patients. Remarkably, most of these miRNAs were found to target genes that are involved in angiogenic processes. Accordingly, some of these miRNAs had predictive value and entered in predictive models of response to therapy, progression of disease, and survival of patients treated with FOLFIRI plus aflibercept. Among these miRNAs, circulating levels of hsa-miR-33b-5p efficiently discriminated between responder and non-responder patients and predicted the risk of disease progression. Moreover, the combination of circulating VEGF-A and miR-33b-5p levels improved clinical stratification of metastatic CRC patients who were to receive FOLFIRI plus aflibercept treatment. In conclusion, our study supports circulating miRNAs as valuable biomarkers for predicting better outcomes in metastatic CRC patients treated with FOLFIRI plus aflibercept.


Assuntos
MicroRNA Circulante , Neoplasias do Colo , Neoplasias Colorretais , MicroRNAs , Neoplasias Retais , Humanos , Neoplasias Colorretais/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorretais/genética , Camptotecina , Fluoruracila , Leucovorina/uso terapêutico , Leucovorina/efeitos adversos , Receptores de Fatores de Crescimento do Endotélio Vascular , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusão/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias do Colo/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Retais/tratamento farmacológico , MicroRNAs/genética , MicroRNAs/uso terapêutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica
4.
Clin. transl. oncol. (Print) ; 23(4): 812-819, abr. 2021. graf
Artigo em Inglês | IBECS | ID: ibc-220917

RESUMO

Background/objectives The incidence of pancreatic cancer is increasing in developed countries. The incorporation of new therapies, to the first-line treatment of patients with good performance status led to better survival in clinical trials. However, there is a wide variability in their use and some concerns about the treatment of elderly patients who were not included in the clinical trials. Methods This is a retrospective multicenter study. Data from consecutive patients diagnosed with metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC) treated with FOLFIRINOX (FFX) or gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) were analysed to evaluate efficacy (overall survival—OS) and toxicity. Results A total of 119 patients were included. 49.6% were treated with FFX and 50.4% with GNP in first-line. The median OS was 12 months with no statistically significant differences between both regimens (12.7 m for FFX vs 10.2 m for GnP). Elevated Ca 19.9 levels and neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio (NLR) increased the risk of death. Patients who received both regimens in first/second line had a median OS longer than 15 months whichever the sequence. 32 patients (27%) were older than 70-y. 54% patients received a second-line treatment, 56% in the FFX group and 44% in the GnP group. The median OS for patients older than 70 was 9.5 m versus 12.3 m for patients younger than 70. Progression of the disease was the cause of death in 67.6% of the patients. Conclusions In our setting, the use of FFX and GnP for treating mPC is quite similar, but superiority could not be demonstrated for any of the schemes in the first line. OS was determined by basal levels of Ca 19.9 and NLR. Patients receiving both regimens in first/second line whichever the sequence, exhibited the best survival rates. In our series, elderly patients had poorer survival rates (AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Desoxicitidina/uso terapêutico , Fluoruracila/uso terapêutico , Irinotecano/uso terapêutico , Leucovorina/uso terapêutico , Paclitaxel/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/secundário , Análise de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento , Estudos Retrospectivos
5.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 23(4): 812-819, 2021 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32857340

RESUMO

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: The incidence of pancreatic cancer is increasing in developed countries. The incorporation of new therapies, to the first-line treatment of patients with good performance status led to better survival in clinical trials. However, there is a wide variability in their use and some concerns about the treatment of elderly patients who were not included in the clinical trials. METHODS: This is a retrospective multicenter study. Data from consecutive patients diagnosed with metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC) treated with FOLFIRINOX (FFX) or gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) were analysed to evaluate efficacy (overall survival-OS) and toxicity. RESULTS: A total of 119 patients were included. 49.6% were treated with FFX and 50.4% with GNP in first-line. The median OS was 12 months with no statistically significant differences between both regimens (12.7 m for FFX vs 10.2 m for GnP). Elevated Ca 19.9 levels and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) increased the risk of death. Patients who received both regimens in first/second line had a median OS longer than 15 months whichever the sequence. 32 patients (27%) were older than 70-y. 54% patients received a second-line treatment, 56% in the FFX group and 44% in the GnP group. The median OS for patients older than 70 was 9.5 m versus 12.3 m for patients younger than 70. Progression of the disease was the cause of death in 67.6% of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: In our setting, the use of FFX and GnP for treating mPC is quite similar, but superiority could not be demonstrated for any of the schemes in the first line. OS was determined by basal levels of Ca 19.9 and NLR. Patients receiving both regimens in first/second line whichever the sequence, exhibited the best survival rates. In our series, elderly patients had poorer survival rates.


Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Paclitaxel/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Causas de Morte , Desoxicitidina/efeitos adversos , Desoxicitidina/uso terapêutico , Progressão da Doença , Feminino , Fluoruracila/efeitos adversos , Fluoruracila/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Irinotecano/efeitos adversos , Irinotecano/uso terapêutico , Leucovorina/efeitos adversos , Leucovorina/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Oxaliplatina/efeitos adversos , Oxaliplatina/uso terapêutico , Paclitaxel/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida , Gencitabina
10.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl ; 99(8): e225-e226, 2017 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28768426

RESUMO

Anti-angiogenics have become an important part of the treatment of several types of tumours such as ovarian, breast, lung and colorectal cancer. Necrotising fasciitis has been reported with bevacizumab but no cases have been reported with aflibercept, ramucirumab or regorafenib in patients with colorectal cancer. Necrotising fasciitis is a rare complication affecting one in 5000 bevacizumab users. We report the case of a 64-year-old man with stage IV rectosigmoid cancer under treatment with folinic acid, fluorouracil and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) and aflibercept, who developed a Fournier's gangrene.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Camptotecina/análogos & derivados , Neoplasias Colorretais , Fasciite Necrosante , Receptores de Fatores de Crescimento do Endotélio Vascular , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusão , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Bevacizumab , Camptotecina/efeitos adversos , Camptotecina/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Colorretais/complicações , Neoplasias Colorretais/tratamento farmacológico , Evolução Fatal , Fluoruracila/efeitos adversos , Fluoruracila/uso terapêutico , Gangrena de Fournier , Humanos , Leucovorina/efeitos adversos , Leucovorina/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Receptores de Fatores de Crescimento do Endotélio Vascular/uso terapêutico , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusão/efeitos adversos , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusão/uso terapêutico
11.
Int J Sports Med ; 37(12): 979-985, 2016 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27557405

RESUMO

Regular physical activity (PA) decreases mortality risk in survivors of breast and colorectal cancer. Such impacts of exercise have prompted initiatives designed both to promote and adequately monitor PA in cancer survivors. This study examines the validity of 2 widely used self-report methods for PA determination, the International Physical Activity Questionnaire short version (IPAQ-SF) and Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ). Both instruments were compared with the triaxial accelerometry (Actigraph) method as an objective reference standard. Study participants were 204 cancer survivors (both sexes, aged 18-79 years). Compared with accelerometry, both questionnaires significantly overestimated PA levels (across all intensities) and underestimated physical inactivity levels. No differences were detected between the 2 questionnaires except for a shorter inactivity time estimated by GPAQ (p=0.001). The Bland and Altman method confirmed that both questionnaires overestimated all PA levels. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis classified IPAQ and GPAQ as fair and poor predictors, respectively, of the proportions of survivors fulfilling international PA recommendations (≥150 min·week-1 of moderate-vigorous PA). IPAQ-SF showed a higher sensitivity but lower specificity than GPAQ. Our data do not support the use of IPAQ-SF or GPAQ to determine PA or inactivity levels in cancer survivors.


Assuntos
Atividade Motora/fisiologia , Neoplasias/reabilitação , Inquéritos e Questionários , Sobreviventes , Acelerometria , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Autorrelato , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Espanha , Adulto Jovem
16.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 8(1): 60-1, 2006 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16632443

RESUMO

The mechanism of action of hypersensitivity reactions from paclitaxel has not been fully understood. It has not even been defined if they are secondary to paclitaxel, its vehicle or the premedication. Postmarketing pharmacovigilance is predominantly based on spontaneous reporting. These reports albeit biased and incomplete serve to detect previously unrecognised adverse events. We report a life threatening adverse event related to paclitaxel without any evidence of histamine release. It consisted of a cardiac arrest probably secondary to bradiarrhythmia or branch block.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos Fitogênicos/efeitos adversos , Bradicardia/induzido quimicamente , Bloqueio de Ramo/induzido quimicamente , Parada Cardíaca/etiologia , Paclitaxel/efeitos adversos , Vigilância de Produtos Comercializados , Adenocarcinoma/tratamento farmacológico , Adenocarcinoma/secundário , Adenocarcinoma/cirurgia , Adrenérgicos/uso terapêutico , Antiarrítmicos/uso terapêutico , Antineoplásicos Fitogênicos/uso terapêutico , Atropina/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Ósseas/secundário , Bradicardia/complicações , Bloqueio de Ramo/complicações , Reanimação Cardiopulmonar , Terapia Combinada , Dexametasona/uso terapêutico , Dispneia/etiologia , Dispneia/terapia , Epinefrina/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Parada Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Parada Cardíaca/terapia , Humanos , Hipotensão/induzido quimicamente , Hipotensão/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/cirurgia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Terapia Neoadjuvante/efeitos adversos , Paclitaxel/uso terapêutico , Pneumonectomia , Respiração Artificial
17.
Oncología (Barc.) ; 29(1): 3-15, ene. 2006. tab
Artigo em En | IBECS | ID: ibc-042871

RESUMO

El cáncer de colon está presenciando en los últimos años un desarrollo científico espectacular. Aproximadamenteel 30% de los pacientes con metástasis hepáticas como única localización, pueden curarse actualmentecon un planteamiento multidisciplinar de la enfermedad. Los tratamientos sistemáticos han desplazado la medianade supervivencia de los 12 meses que se alcanzaban hace cuatro años a 20 meses e incluso más allá. Laincorporación de nuevos tratamientos biológicos en el contexto de los tratamientos neoadyuvantes, podría mejorarlos resultados históricos y mantiene la esperanza de que prosiga esta tendencia.Se considera esencial un diseño correcto de los ensayos clínicos y la elección de objetivos apropiados, contratamientos tanto en primera como en segunda línea, administrados con intención neoadyuvante


Colon cancer witnesses one of most exciting and evolving times in the latest years. About 30% of patientswith isolated liver colon metastases can now be cured through a multidisciplinary approach of the disease.New systemic treatments have moved the median survival of metastatic disease from 12 months four yearsago to 20 months and beyond. Incorporation of new biologic treatments into the neoadjuvant setting may helpto further improve historical outcomes and offers promise to continue this trend.Appropriate surrogate endpoints and optimal designs of clinical trials on neoadjuvant therapy as first or second-line of treatment are needed


Assuntos
Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/complicações , Neoplasias do Colo/secundário , Terapia Biológica/métodos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patologia , Metástase Neoplásica/terapia , Neoplasias do Colo/terapia , Terapia Neoadjuvante/métodos
18.
Anticancer Drugs ; 15(4): 321-9, 2004 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15057135

RESUMO

Naturally derived anticancer agents continue to be instrumental in the systemic therapeutic intervention against solid tumors and hematological malignancies. Such compounds now have a relevant role in contemporary models of combination with targeted agents, thus providing a rationale to consider nature as a valid tool to discover new innovative anticancer agents. The marine ecosystem has increasingly been the focus of interest for new discoveries in the field that are expected to be of significant therapeutic impact in cancer patients. A critical review of the integrated data generated in our marine-derived anticancer program seems to confirm such expentancies. ET-743 (Yondelis) represents the first new agent developed against advanced pretreated soft tissue sarcoma in the past 25 years, and also harbors activity in women bearing pretreated ovarian cancer and a solid potential in combination therapy. The lack of cumulative toxicities makes this compound suitable for long-lasting therapies, reversible transaminitis being the most prevalent toxicity. Aplidin has shown a positive therapeutic index in phase I trials and phase II studies are ongoing. In contrast to the lack of bone marrow toxicity, a set of translational results anticipates a potential in leukemia. Kahalalide F has also successfully completed the phase I program in solid tumors with evidence of activity in resistant tumors and phase II studies are under way. Finally, the mechanistic data generated in parallel with the clinical program confirms the potential of the marine ecosystem in the discovery of new agents acting against new cellular targets of relevance in cancer cell biology.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Depsipeptídeos , Biologia Marinha , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Antineoplásicos/isolamento & purificação , Antineoplásicos Alquilantes/isolamento & purificação , Antineoplásicos Alquilantes/uso terapêutico , Química Farmacêutica , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Dioxóis/isolamento & purificação , Dioxóis/farmacologia , Humanos , Isoquinolinas/isolamento & purificação , Isoquinolinas/farmacologia , Peptídeos/isolamento & purificação , Peptídeos/uso terapêutico , Peptídeos Cíclicos/isolamento & purificação , Peptídeos Cíclicos/uso terapêutico , Tetra-Hidroisoquinolinas , Trabectedina
19.
J Clin Oncol ; 21(17): 3207-13, 2003 Sep 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12947054

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To compare the survival benefit obtained with cisplatin plus gemcitabine, a cisplatin-based triplet, and nonplatinum sequential doublets in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Stage IIIB to IV NSCLC patients were randomly assigned to receive cisplatin 100 mg/m2 day 1 plus gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m2 days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks for six cycles (CG); cisplatin 100 mg/m2 day 1 plus gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 and vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks for six cycles (CGV); or gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 plus vinorelbine 30 mg/m2 days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks for three cycles, followed by vinorelbine 30 mg/m2 days 1 and 8 plus ifosfamide 3 g/m2 day 1, every 3 weeks for three cycles (GV-VI). RESULTS: Five hundred fifty-seven patients were assigned to treatment (182 CG, 188 CGV, 187 GV-VI). Response rates were significantly inferior for the nonplatinum sequential doublet (CG, 42%; CGV, 41%; GV-VI, 27%; CG v GV-VI, P =.003). No differences in median survival or time to progression were observed. Toxicity was higher for the triplet: grade 3 to 4 neutropenia (GC, 32%; CGV, 57%; GV-VI, 27%; P <.05); neutropenic fever (CG, 4%; CGV, 19%; GV-VI, 5%; P <.0001); grade 3 to 4 thrombocytopenia (CG, 19%; CGV, 23%; GV-VI, 3%; P =.0001); and grade 3 to 4 emesis (GC, 22%; GCV, 32%; GV-VI, 6%; P <.0001). CONCLUSION: On the basis of these results, CG remains a standard regimen for first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC.


Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/tratamento farmacológico , Cisplatino/administração & dosagem , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Desoxicitidina/administração & dosagem , Ifosfamida/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamento farmacológico , Vimblastina/análogos & derivados , Vimblastina/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Idoso , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/patologia , Progressão da Doença , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Espanha , Análise de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento , Vinorelbina , Gencitabina
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...